Standardization of Chebulagic Acid as Quality Marker of Tibetan Medicine Terminalia Chebula
-
摘要: 以藏药诃子为原料,研制诃黎勒酸国家标准样品. 诃子经60%乙醇提取,大孔树脂富集,制备液相色谱技术得到诃黎勒酸标准品. 采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)、液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)和薄层色谱(TLC)等手段进行纯度分析. 采用紫外光谱(UV)、红外光谱(IR)、高分辨质谱(MS)和核磁共振波谱(NMR)技术进行结构确认. 最后进行均匀性、稳定性和联合定值. 结果表明,诃黎勒酸样品均匀性良好,4 ℃储存,24个月内稳定. 联合定值确定诃黎勒酸纯度标准值为99.33%,符合国家标准品的要求. 研制出的诃黎勒酸(GSB 11-3724-2020)国家标准样品,可用于含量测定、检测方法评定、相关产品的检测与质量控制.Abstract: A certified reference material of chebulagic acid has been developed using a Tibetan medicine Terminalia Chebula as the raw material. Terminalia Chebula was extracted with 60% ethanol, enriched by the macroporous resin and through the preparative liquid chromatographic purification to obtain chebulagic acid. The purity analysis was carried out by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and thin-layer chromatography (TLC). The structure was identified using ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy, infrared (IR) spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Finally, the homogeneity, stability and cooperative certification were carried out. The results indicated that the chebulagic acid has a good uniformity and a fine stability within 24 months at 4 ℃. The standard value of the purity of chebulagic acid was 99.33%, which was in accordance with the requirements of the certified reference material. The developed chebulagic acid (GSB 11-3724-2020) can be used for the content determination, method evaluation, testing and quality control of related products.
-
Key words:
- chebulagic acid /
- reference material /
- homogeneity /
- stability /
- certification
-
表 1 仪器型号
Table 1. Models of instruments
仪器名称 仪器型号 公司 液相色谱质谱仪 Agilent 6520 Q-TOF 美国安捷伦公司 高效液相色谱仪 Agilent 1260 美国安捷伦公司 大孔树脂纯化柱 50 L 浙江温兄机械阀业有限公司 循环超声提取仪 CTXNW-100B 北京弘祥隆生物技术股份有限公司 红外光谱仪 Vertex 70 德国布鲁克公司 核磁共振波谱仪 BRUKER 400 MHz 德国布鲁克公司 热重分析仪 SHIMADZU TG-40 DTA-40M 日本岛津公司 高效制备液相色谱仪 LC-8A岛津 日本岛津公司 冷冻干燥机 GLZ-1B 上海浦东冷冻干燥设备有限公司 表 2 参加定值实验室及仪器型号
Table 2. Laboratories participated in calibration and models of instrument
序号 实验室名称 HPLC仪器型号 1 北京市理化分析测试中心 Shimadzu LC-20A 2 中国科学院新疆理化技术研究所 Waters e2695 3 山东大学化学与化工学院 Waters 2695 4 山东省科学院生物研究所 Agilent 1200 5 山东省中医药研究院 Waters e2695 6 山东蓝城分析测试有限公司 Agilent 1200 7 济南市出入境检验检疫局 Agilent 1260 8 山东省分析测试中心 Agilent 1260 表 3 诃黎勒酸的核磁共振氢谱信号
Table 3. 1H NMR data of chebulagic acid
化合物 位置 测定值(400 MHz,MeOH-d4) 文献值(500 MHz,MeOH-d4)[21] Glucose 1 6.50 (1H, s) 6.47 (1H, s) 2 5.39 (1H, brs) 5.46 (1H, s) 3 5.82 (1H, brs) 5.86 (1H, s) 4 5.23 (1H, d, J= 3.0 Hz) 5.19 (1H, d, J=3.6 Hz) 5 4.81 (1H, overlap) 4.80 (1H, t, J=17.4 Hz) 6a 4.37 (1H, dd, J=10.2, 7.8 Hz) 4.38 (1H, dd, J=10.8, 8.0 Hz,) 6b 4.86 (1H, overlap) 4.70 (1H, t, 20.3 Hz) Chebuloyl 2' 4.79 (1H, d, J=7.4 Hz) 4.84 (1H, d, J=7.2 Hz) 3' 5.04 (1H, d, J=7.4, 1.2 Hz) 5.04 (1H, dd, J=7.3, 1.5 Hz) 4' 3.80 (1H, m) 3.80 (1H, m) 5' 2.15(2H, m) 2.11 (2H, d, J=4.5 Hz) 2'' 7.48 (1H, s) 7.46 (1H, s) 1-O-Galloyl-2,6 7.07 (2H, s) 7.11 (2H, s) HHDP (3-O end) 6.84 (2H, s) 6.98 (2H, s) HHDP (6-O end) 6.63 (2H, s) 6.62 (2H, s) 表 4 诃黎勒酸的碳谱数据
Table 4. 13C NMR data of chebulagic acid
化合物 位置 测定值(100 MHz,MeOH-d4) 文献值(150.9 MHz,MeOH-d4)[21] 化合物 位置 测定值(100 MHz,MeOH-d4) 文献值(150.9 MHz,MeOH-d4)[21] Glucose 1 91.1 91.7 1-O-Galloyl 1''' 118.7 119.7 2 69.7 70.7 2''', 6''' 109.5 110.4 3 61.0 61.8 3''', 5''' 145.1 145.9 4 65.6 66.3 4''' 139.5 140.0 5 72.9 73.7 7''' 164.9 165.3 6 63.3 63.9 HHDP
(3-O end)1 114.6 115.2 Chebuloyl 1' 169.4 169.8 2 124.2 125.2 2' 65.4 66.2 3 106.8 107.5 3' 40.3 40.9 4 144.8 145.3 4' 38.6 39.2 5 136.2 136.2 5' 29.2 29.9 6 143.9 144.6 6' 173.6 173.6 7 168.7 168.7 7' 173.0 173.2 HHDP
(6-O end)1' 116.3 117.1 1'' 114.8 115.7 2' 123.1 124.2 2'' 117.6 118.4 3' 109.1 110.1 3'' 116.2 116.9 4' 144.2 145.1 4'' 146.0 146.5 5' 137.3 137.6 5'' 139.0 139.7 6' 144.1 144.8 6'' 140.0 140.8 7' 166.1 166.4 7'' 165.0 165.6 表 5 均匀性检验的测量数据
Table 5. Measurement data of homogeneity test
/% 瓶号 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 第1份 99.49 99.49 99.50 99.48 99.46 99.50 99.48 99.49 99.49 99.48 第2份 99.49 99.46 99.51 99.48 99.49 99.51 99.49 99.47 99.48 99.50 第3份 99.47 99.46 99.47 99.50 99.47 99.49 99.48 99.48 99.49 99.49 平均值 99.48 99.47 99.49 99.49 99.47 99.50 99.48 99.48 99.49 99.49 总体平均值 99.49 表 6 均匀性研究的方差分析表
Table 6. Variance analysis of homogeneity test
变差源 方差和(SS) 自由度 均方差(MS) 瓶间 0.002 1 9 0.000 24 瓶内 0.003 2 20 0.000 16 总和 0.005 3 29 表 7 短期稳定性检验试验结果
Table 7. Data of short-term stability test
温度/℃ 平均值/% 标准偏差/% 不确定度/% −20 99.37 0.02 0.04 2~8 99.42 0.02 20 99.44 0.02 40 99.39 0.02 60 99.34 0.02 表 8 长期稳定性检验数据
Table 8. Data of long-term stability test
时间/月 平均值/% 标准偏差/% 不确定度/% 0 99.45 0.02 0.24 6 99.39 0.03 12 99.42 0.03 18 99.35 0.02 24 99.38 0.02 表 9 诃黎勒酸定值结果统计分析表
Table 9. Statistical analysis of certified value of chebulagic acid
/% 实验室序号 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 平均值 99.60 99.58 99.57 99.52 99.45 99.47 99.44 99.39 标准偏差 0.09 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.05 x 99.50 Sr 0.05 SL 0.08 $S\left(\overline{\overline{x} }\right)$ 0.03 表 10 不确定度
Table 10. Table of uncertainty
/% 样品名称 不确定度 定值 均匀性 短期稳定性 长期稳定性 水分 灰分 合成 扩展 诃黎勒酸 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.24 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.50 -
[1] 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 标准样品工作导则 第2部分: 常用术语及定义: GB/T 15000.2—2019[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019. [2] 耿岩玲, 林云良, 王岱杰, 等. 人参皂苷Re标准样品的研制[J]. 时珍国医国药,2020,31(4):993-997 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2020.04.071GENG Yanling, LIN Yunliang, WANG Daijie, et al. Preparation of ginsenoside Re certified reference materials[J]. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research,2020,31 (4):993-997. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2020.04.071 [3] 王硕, 陈涛, 王岱杰, 等. 大麦黄苷和皂草黄苷标准样品的制备与标准化研究[J]. 分析试验室,2023,42(1):38-44 doi: 10.13595/j.cnki.issn1000-0720.2021.110602WANG Shuo, CHEN Tao, WANG Daijie, et al. Research of preparation and standardization of lutonarin and saponarin standard samples[J]. Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory,2023,42 (1):38-44. doi: 10.13595/j.cnki.issn1000-0720.2021.110602 [4] 王岱杰, 林云良, 耿岩玲, 等. 厚朴酚标准样品的研制[J/OL]. 天然产物研究与开发: 1-11WANG Daijie, LIN Yunliang, GENG Yanling, et al. Preparation of certified reference materials of magnolol[J/OL]. Natural Product Research and Development: 1-11. [5] 王岱杰, 于金倩, 崔莉, 等. 熊果酸标准样品的研制[J]. 食品研究与开发,2018,39(22):79-85 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2018.22.014WANG Daijie, YU Jinqian, CUI Li, et al. Preparation of certified reference materials of ursolic acid[J]. Food Research and Development,2018,39 (22):79-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2018.22.014 [6] 宋志博, 陈涛, 王岱杰, 等. 藏药诃子质量标志物诃子酸的分离分析及标准化研究[J]. 分析测试技术与仪器,2021,27(3):165-173 doi: 10.16495/j.1006-3757.2021.03.003SONG Zhibo, CHEN Tao, WANG Daijie, et al. Separation and standardization of chebulinic acid as quality marker of tibetan medicine terminalia chebula[J]. Analysis and Testing Technology and Instruments,2021,27 (3):165-173. doi: 10.16495/j.1006-3757.2021.03.003 [7] 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典(一部2020年版)[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 194. [8] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 药品标准·藏药(第一册)[M]. 北京: 中华人民共和国卫生部, 1995. [9] 周坤, 简平, 梁文仪, 等. 基于UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS分析藏药诃子与毛诃子化学成分[J]. 质谱学报,2020,41(3):254-267ZHOU Kun, JIAN Ping, LIANG Wenyi, et al. Analysis on chemical constituents from terminalia chebula Retz. and terminalia bellerica (gaertn.) roxb by UPLC-Q-exactive quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society,2020,41 (3):254-267. [10] 赵鹿, 廖翠萍, 杨秀娟, 等. 诃子的研究进展及质量标志物的预测[J]. 中草药,2020,51(10):2732-2744 doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2020.10.015ZHAO Lu, LIAO Cuiping, YANG Xiujuan, et al. Research progress in Terminalia chebula and its predictive analysis on Q-marker[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs,2020,51 (10):2732-2744. doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2020.10.015 [11] Yang Y J, Xiu J H, Liu J N, et al. Chebulagic acid, a hydrolyzable tannin, exhibited antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo against human enterovirus 71[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2013,14 (5):9618-9627. doi: 10.3390/ijms14059618 [12] Li P, Du R K, Wang Y Y, et al. Identification of chebulinic acid and chebulagic acid as novel influenza viral neuraminidase inhibitors[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2020,11 :182. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00182 [13] Vijaya P, Ketayun D, Debjani D. Novel antipropionibacterium activity of embelin and chebulagic acid on screening of Indian medicinal plants[J]. International Research Journal of Pharmacy,2017,8 (5):45-52. doi: 10.7897/2230-8407.08571 [14] Athira A P, Abhinand C S, Saja K, et al. Anti-angiogenic effect of chebulagic acid involves inhibition of the VEGFR2- and GSK-3β-dependent signaling pathways[J]. Biochemistry and Cell Biology,2017,95 (5):563-570. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2016-0132 [15] Reddy D B, Reddanna P. Chebulagic acid (CA) attenuates LPS-induced inflammation by suppressing NF-κB and MAPK activation in RAW 264 7 macrophages[J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,2009,381 (1):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.02.022 [16] 段微微, 唐恩柱. 热重分析仪在钯碳催化剂灰分测定的应用[J]. 天津化工,2009,23(1):58-59 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1267.2009.01.022DUAN Weiwei, TANG Enzhu. The application of TGA in testing the ash of Pol carbon catalyst[J]. Tianjin Chemical Industry,2009,23 (1):58-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1267.2009.01.022 [17] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 标准样品工作导则(3) 标准样品 定值的一般原则和统计方法: GB/T 15000.3—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008. [18] 陈静娴, 王岱杰, 周晓晶, 等. 二氢辣椒碱标准样品的研制[J]. 食品研究与开发,2015,36(15):82-86 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2015.15.020CHEN Jingxian, WANG Daijie ZHOU Xiaojing, et al. Preparation of Certified Reference Materials of Dihydrocapsaicin[J]. Food Research And Development,2015,36 (15):82-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2015.15.020 [19] 申诚, 陈涛, 王岱杰, 等. 雏菊叶龙胆酮快速制备与标准化分析[J]. 分析试验室,2021,40(8):905-910 doi: 10.13595/j.cnki.issn1000-0720.2020.112801SHEN Chen, CHEN Tao, WANG Daijie, et al. Rapid preparation and standardization analysis of Bellidifolin[J]. Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory,2021,40 (8):905-910. doi: 10.13595/j.cnki.issn1000-0720.2020.112801 [20] 宁凡盛, 路岩翔, 曹桂云, 等. 银杏内酯C标准样品的研制[J]. 山东科学,2022,35(2):18-28 doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2022.02.003NING Fansheng, LU Yanxiang, CAO Guiyun, et al. Preparation of certified reference material of Ginkgolides C[J]. Shandong Science,2022,35 (2):18-28. doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2022.02.003 [21] Gunawan-Puteri M D P T, Kawabata J. Novel α-glucosidase inhibitors from Macaranga tanarius leaves[J]. Food Chemistry,2010,123 (2):384-389. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.050 -