E-alert
闫韫, 陶雪, 宗栋良, 常爱敏, 邓吴斌. 3种现场快速水质检测仪的性价对比[J]. 分析测试技术与仪器, 2018, 24(3): 159-162. DOI: 10.16495/j.1006-3757.2018.03.005
引用本文: 闫韫, 陶雪, 宗栋良, 常爱敏, 邓吴斌. 3种现场快速水质检测仪的性价对比[J]. 分析测试技术与仪器, 2018, 24(3): 159-162. DOI: 10.16495/j.1006-3757.2018.03.005
shu
YAN Yun, TAO Xue, ZONG Dong-liang, CHANG Ai-min, DENG Wu-bin. Performanceto Price Comparison of Three On-Site Rapid Water Quality Detectors[J]. Analysis and Testing Technology and Instruments, 2018, 24(3): 159-162. DOI: 10.16495/j.1006-3757.2018.03.005
Citation: YAN Yun, TAO Xue, ZONG Dong-liang, CHANG Ai-min, DENG Wu-bin. Performanceto Price Comparison of Three On-Site Rapid Water Quality Detectors[J]. Analysis and Testing Technology and Instruments, 2018, 24(3): 159-162. DOI: 10.16495/j.1006-3757.2018.03.005
shu

3种现场快速水质检测仪的性价对比

Performanceto Price Comparison of Three On-Site Rapid Water Quality Detectors

    摘要
  • 摘要: 选择了市场上口碑好、占有率高的3款便携式水质现场应急检测设备，通过准确度、精密度、检测时长及价格等指标，以权重积分法对3款仪器进行了比选，结果表明德国MN公司的PF-12型便携式多参数分光光度计的综合性能最优.

     

    Abstract: Three portable water quality on-site emergency testing equipment with good reputation and high occupancy in the market were selected. Through the indexes of accuracy, precision, detection time, price, etc., the three instruments are selected by the weight integral method. The results showed that the PF-12 portable multi-parameter spectrophotometer of MN company, Germany, has the best comprehensive performance.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(3)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回